An arguments in favor and against human cloning

There are biological and social reasons, other than medical reasons, for human cloning. The Center for Genetics and Society believes that when all the arguments are considered together the case for allowing human cloning is not compelling, and that the harms of doing so are great.

Arguments Against Cloning

Would the cloned child be "sacred" in the eyes of those who affirm the sacredness of human life? What would it feel like to be a child that a significant portion of society wants to "ban"?

We imagine the case in which the resultant beings will have lives well worth living. These are indeed serious, perhaps impregnable objections. Further, this argument appropriates the phrase "genetically related" to embrace a condition that has never before occurred in human history, one which abolishes the genetic variations that have always existed between parent and child.

Six arguments in favor of and against cloning

Godthe Father, sent His only Son to satisfy that judgment for those who believe in Him. A child produced by cloning would be the genetic duplicate of an existing person.

For example, it took hundreds of attempts to clone Dolly the sheep. Treatment of infertility has become a medical sub-specialty. Religions are just a creation story to tell us how we magically came to be poof we are here. If human cloning were accepted to be safe next year, why should it then not be permitted?

The re are many instances of unusual family relationships. In general, notions that the cloning of individuals, possibly at the same rate as for IVF, would decrease genetic diversity in a global population of six billion people, is an exaggerated and spurious claim.

That a clone could be compared to its alter ego is not an argument against cloning. There are plenty of arguments against cloning - especially against cloning humans - ranging from scientific issues, to the practicality of cloning, to religious objections.

Some argue that we could produce clones to provide "spare parts" for people who need transplants. For example, it took hundreds of attempts to clone Dolly the sheep. Mark Benson god dos nut want it guys so stahp Reply to Mark Benson. As for spare parts, it would be no more ethical to use a clone for that purpose than it would be to use your next door neighbor.

What is your response? Opponents of human cloning offer three answers to this challenge: The first is the good of human freedom: Those who favor cloning humans argue that we could produce more geniuses and thereby improve life for everyone through their contributions.

This raises a series of questions and problems: Better therefore to allow it and to regulate its use. Moreover, it seems especially problematic to say that human dignity depends in a fundamental way on family lineage, when it is clear that people born to single parents, people who are adopted, and people reared in "non-traditional" families all acquire an intelligible and meaningful place in the world.

If reproductive cloning is permitted to happen and becomes accepted, it is difficult to see how any other dangerous applications of genetic engineering technology could be proscribed. Religion is a passifier to hale the human race and give it meaning, and a reason to work together.

This will be true only if we allow it to be true. If you truly believe and trust this in your heart, receiving Jesus alone as your Saviordeclaring, " Jesus is Lord ," you will be saved from judgment and spend eternity with God in heaven.

An example is hip displasia in purebred dogs.Human versus Post-Human: Those who appeal to human nature and traditional virtue in opposition to cloning must acknowledge that much of human history is a story of cruelty, failure, and suffering.

It may be that human nature -- or the human condition -- can be. I have three arguments against reproductive cloning (that is, the ‘Not IVF’ Argument, the “Unacceptable Medical Risks” Argument, the ‘Psychological Harms’ Argument), and one objection against a Clonaid website argument – I’ll refer to that objection as my “Anti.

A rebuttal of arguments against human cloning. 1. The arguments against human cloning, such as those presented in the Andrews Report, are weak, except for the safety issue. The arguments can either be applied with equal force to other ethical situations that are not prohibited, or are inconsistent with the three principles listed above.

Moral Arguments in Favour of Human Cloning Dr. Josephus J. Brimah School of Education Njala University Sierra Leone Abstract With the cloning of the sheep Dolly, arguments were made by so many scholars that the same technique of somatic nuclear cell transplant could be used to clone human persons.

This was vehemently opposed to on. There are plenty of arguments against cloning - especially against cloning humans - ranging from scientific issues, to the practicality of cloning, to religious objections.

On the scientific side, we see that a large percentage of cloning efforts end in failure. Reasons For and Against Human Cloning Recently, the controversy around human cloning has received a lot of news coverage; yet unsurprisingly, a clear and thorough examination of both sides has been lacking from the news media.

An arguments in favor and against human cloning
Rated 3/5 based on 40 review